menu 5 Solar System
Erasmus+: Key action 2:Strategic Partnerships in School Education

Practical Exercise 8: PARAMETERS OF PLANET TRAJECTORIES

In aable 1, for each planet there is given its synodic orbital period as measured by a terrestrial astronomer. Complete the table with the calculated value of the sidereal orbital periods of the planets and derive the main half-axes of the planets.

Table 1 Synodic orbital periods of the planets and other parameters

Planet Synodic period [day]
Synodic period [year] Sidereal period [year] Main half-axis [au]
Mercury 116
Venus 584
Mars 780
Jupiter 399
Saturn 378
Uranus 370
Neptune 367

Answer:

ahe planets move around the Sun in the same direction, the mutual angular velocity of the Earth and the planets is calculated as the difference of their angular velocities: , resp. v, resp. . From the definition of angular velocity we get:

We calculate the main half-axis from Kepler’s third law:

, where , where , where .

Table 1 – answer

Planet Synodic period [day] Synodic period [year] Sidereal pe-riod [year] Main half-axis [au]
Mercury 116 88,0 0,241 0,387
Venus 584 225 0,615 0,723
Mars 780 678 1,88 1,52
Jupiter 399 4320 11,8 5,19
Saturn 378 10800 29,6 9,56
Uranus 370 28500 78,0 18,3
Neptune 367 76600 210 35,3


ahe calculated values in the table are almost identical to the actual values, with the exception of Uranus and Neptune. ahe actual values of the main half-axes and periods for Uranus are: T = 84,1 years T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune they are: T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune they are: T = 165 years, T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune they are: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic orbital period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T♅synod = 369,65 days and of Neptune T = 84,1 years, a  =  19,2 au; for Neptune: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic orbital period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T♅synod = 369,65 days and of Neptune T♆synod = 367,49 days. dwe would get the following results T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic orbital period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T♅synod = 369,65 days and of Neptune T♆synod = 367,49 days , we would get the following results T = 84,1 years, T = 84,1 years,  a = 19,2 au; for Neptune: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic orbital period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T♅synod = 369,65 days and of Neptune T♆synod = 367,49 days, we would get the following results T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; T = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic orbital period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T♅synod = 369,65 days and of Neptune T♆synod = 367,49 days, we would get the following resultsT = 84,1 days, a = 19,2 au; T = 164 days, T = 84,1 days, a = 19,2 au; for Neptune: T = 165 years, a = 30,1 au. ahe more significant difference between the calculated and actual values lies in the similarity between the synodic orbital period and the period of the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. If we wanted to achieve a more accurate result, we would have to indicate the synodic orbital period for a larger number of valid places. If we substituted for the synodic period of Uranus T♅synod = 369,65days and of Neptune T♆synod = 367,49 days, we would get the following resultsT = 84,1 years, a = 19,2 au; T = 164 years, a = 30,0 au.